|
Perry
Farrell Re-invents; Talks About the Reviving Lollapalooza and
Being an Artist
by Tina Whelski
Photos by
Tina Whelski

Lollapalooza
returned this year, transforming itself from a touring music
festival to a one-site, two-day affair July 23-24 set in
Chicago’s Grant Park. Showing the same tenacity he became known
for when he pioneered the alternative music festival in 1991,
Lollapalooza founder/organizer and former Jane’s Addiction front
man Perry Farrell revised the event to adapt to the concert
industry’s changing climate and to regain control over the
integrity of the Lolla experience. Over 60 acts lined up for
the revived showcase, with stellar live performances by The
Arcade Fire, The Bravery, …And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of
Dead, Louis XIV, Drive-By Truckers, The Killers, Weezer, Primus,
and Farrell’s new project, Satellite Party, a nebulous,
satisfying musical experience staged with former Extreme
guitarist Nuno Bettencourt and No Doubt’s Tony Kanal on bass.
In introducing The Arcade Fire, Farrell explained that they were an
example that it’s still possible to be original. In restoring
Lollapalooza Farrell proved there are always alternate paths
towards that goal.
Perry Farrell
talks to WomanRock about reviving the festival in today's
challenging concert industry and on being an artist.
WOMANROCK:
Lollapalooza used to be a touring alternative music festival.
With the event becoming a destination festival this year, will
you comment on how you think your revised format strengthened it
and why you picked Chicago as the site?
PERRY FARRELL:
I guess you have to go back probably seven years when certain
corporations were buying promoters around the country. What
they did at the same time was bought property and form-fitted
tours into the property using the promoters that they pretty
much owned. What this did for the concert business, for myself
as an independent promoter, was rather than being able to go
around the country and meet different promoters and say to them,
find us a great location, we really had no options but to play
in amphitheatres. These amphitheatres came with deals for
vendors that were pre-cut. There wasn’t much room for us to
bring in the type of food and the type of extra things that we
like to present to the audience. It also price-fixed the
package. Let’s say a promoter said, "Hey you can come play in my
venue and I’ll pay you so much." Because there was a monopoly
around the country on the venues and the promoters, the price
fix was getting lower and lower and therefore the quality of the
festival was beginning to suffer. Rather than being able to
say, “Hey, let’s do something crazy and build a technology
gaming system,” if the overseeing corporate promoter didn’t want
to pay for that, you had no money for it. It was basically just
turning into like a radio show. They would pay you what they
felt they wanted to pay you for the acts. You didn’t even have
room to negotiate that, so a lot of times, you’d basically be
doing it for free. I hate to admit it, but I have made so
little money putting Lollapalooza together. It got less and
less and less to where the last year we were going out, there
really wasn’t a chance to make any money at all because the
promoter had us by the balls. So what I decided to do is look
for our own location. I was very lucky and found a private
backer, yet another independent promoter, one of the very few
left in the country. There’s probably less then five…What we
did was we teamed up and we looked for our own location and
decided to refine Lollapalooza. Lollapalooza was in its day, the
first traveling festival. In 1991 it started all the other
traveling festivals. It was a wonderful concept and the country
really loved it, but it was a different time. There was not the
monopoly that there is today, so we changed the model and we
went to a location and built it ourselves and you know what? It
has proven to be a very good idea.
WOMANROCK:
After last year’s cancelled show, how excited are you to have
it back?
FARRELL: It
was beyond my expectations. I honestly didn’t think I would
ever do another Lollapalooza. As you know, the way things are
with the monopolies and the corporations, once a tragedy happens
to you in the business world, it’s very hard to regain your
footing. I almost believed it myself.
WOMANROCK:
You were able to maintain the festival’s integrity and bring
atmosphere back with the location.
FARRELL: I
think we have more integrity than we’ve had since probably 1994
now because we look over everything and locations are wonderful
again. We’re paying for the groups that we want and I think
that you feel it. It’s kind of like home cooking.
You’ll taste the different.
WOMANROCK:
Tell us about your new project Satellite Party.
FARRELL:
Satellite Party is being developed into a play that will
eventually become a feature film. As I was writing this, I had
the good sense to realize I needed a musical partner in this and
I sat down with this amazing musician, Nuno Bettencourt, who’s
just one of the gre at guitar players of our day. I don’t know
if you’ve heard him?
WOMANROCK:
He’s formerly from Extreme?
FARRELL:
That was his band back in the eighties and this guy is just as
far as guitar, you ask guitar players about Nuno and there’s
agreement that he’s just a great player…The music of Satellite
Party is sounding even better than I would have expected because
we have a somewhat difficult arrangement in that we work with
electronics. We play with sequencers and things like that and
that’s not an easy thing to pull off and really play. There are
people who play with sequencers who really don’t play. Then
there’s people who can’t play with sequencers. We are doing a
wonderful job and it sounds powerful and I’m starting to move
like I did in the day—a great sign for me…The people who have
helped me to write the Satellite Party are Fergie from Black
Eyed Peas who came in and sang on probably three tracks. We have
Flea, who has written probably four songs with me. John
Frusciante wrote one with Flea and I. The core is just Nuno and
I…I’d love to see the music tour for a time, but I’d absolutely
like to see within three years it become a feature…I really want
to create something that will be in the future for all times
sake a classic and so that’s what I’m looking for from the
Satellite Party. It’s a beautiful story and the music’s
beautiful too. I want it to come to fruition and be something
that changes the perception of people. Maybe it even opens up a
paradigm in thinking of mankind.
WOMANROCK:
I saw you speak about Lollapalooza at Pollstar’s Concert
Industry Consortium last year, but you also talked about how you
think “everyone is an artist at one time.” You were talking
about how the artist is one who “continues to believe he can
self-decorate the world.” What does being an artist mean to you
today and how do you balance that with being a business man?
FARRELL: The
artist in a way has an edge on life in that he really sees the
depth and the realities even further than most people, but the
problem with that is you get to see how pathetic human beings
can be at times and how cruel and how brazen and just the lack
of regard human beings have for each other, so they’re blessed,
but they get cursed because their lenses are so clear. Then at
the same time, they are very much overlooked because people just
consider that what they created should have just been there or
was there. They don’t realize what it takes to get it
there. It takes your imagination, your time to pull it out of
your mind and either put it to paper or record it to tape or
digital. So they’re not appreciated. This is what I think
really kills them. It’s the guy who in school might be wearing
the letter jacket (who in probably five years is going to be
working for an insurance company nonetheless but has got bigger
muscles). Unfortunately, I see this in music too. That person
gets all the girls if you know what I mean. Artists understand
their own value and at the same time they realize that others
don’t. So the artist has to kind of suffer through life.
WOMANROCK:
On being a businessman/woman “and” artist then?
FARRELL: You
have to really balance that out. What I like is I like to
become clever. There’s a lot of ways you can get exposure.
People may say all press is good press. I disagree with that
quote. You don’t want to be known as the person who’s got
something really cheesy. You don’t want to be known as the
person who sold out. You want to be known as an author. You
“authenticate” something. I feel that you go to your strengths
and you create something that will turn peoples’ heads and
that’s how you do it. You become ingenious, rather than
following what’s going on and cashing in on things or stooping
away from what your God-given talent is. You create something
that will be a classic.
Tina
Whelski is Editor of Womanrock.com. She is also a columnist and
feature writer for The Aquarian Weekly/East Coast Rocker
www.theaquarian.com
, Managing Editor of Starpolish.com
www.starpolish.com
, and contributes to The Hollywood Reporter
www.hollywoodreporter.com
, Modern Drummer
www.moderndrummer.com
.
Music Connection
www.musicconnection.com
and Good Times magazine
www.goodtimesmag.com
. Additionally she consults for Fearless Music TV
www.fearlessmusic.com
.
Home |
Features |
CD Reviews |
Live Reviews |
Columns
Tina's Editor's Note |
Events |
Message Board |
MusicShop
Join
|
Contact |
Past Issues |
Jobs
|
Links
About Founder Brenda Kahn
www.womanrock.com
© 1999-2005.
WOMANROCK.com. All Rights Reserved
|